Ad Words Landing Page Quality Score
Read More from Inside AdWords, the Ad Words Blog.
by Matthew Richardson, Amit Prakash, Eric Brill
Since the publication of Brin and Page's paper on PageRank, many in the Web community have depended on PageRank for the static (query-independent) ordering of Web pages. We show that we can significantly outperform PageRank using features that are independent of the link structure of the Web. We gain a further boost in accuracy by using data on the frequency at which users visit Web pages. We use RankNet, a ranking machine learning algorithm, to combine these and other static features based on anchor text and domain characteristics. The resulting model achieves a static ranking pairwise accuracy of 67.3% (vs. 56.7% for PageRank or 50% for random).
Read the Technical Paper on Machine Learning for Static Ranking
You ever want a way to determine the number of supplemental results a particular site may have? In the past, you did a site command and sifted through the available pages to get an idea on that number. Now, Google appears to allow you to see those results by entering in the syntax [site:www.domain.com ***].
by William Slawski
This post doesn’t describe the actual creation of content for a site, from an SEO stance, but it does detail some of the planning and steps that can be taken to help in the process.
It also doesn’t discuss some of the technical aspects of SEO that should be planned for to make a site easier to be found by search engines. But it does provide a number of questions that may make it easier for someone who is considering optimizing their site for search engines as they are putting together content for the pages of their site.
One of my favorite articles of the past few years on design is a Digital Web article from 2003 by G.A. Buchholz, titled A Content Requirements Plan (CRP) helps Web designers take a leadership role.
I think that part of the planning of the content of a site also should include an awareness of search engines, and a knowledge of some SEO goals. Those goals aren’t too difficult to keep in mind when it comes to creating the words for a site, but are definitely worth considering
When it comes to optimizing your website for search engines, when is enough... enough? And why is overoptimization a problem?
Overdoing on SEO tactics to enhance performance on search engine results pages can backfire, said panelists Heather Lloyd Martin,president and CEO of Successworks, Matt Bailey, an SEO Consultant, and Michael Murray, Vice President of Fathom SEO in the "SEO Overkill" session.
At a minimum, your site will look clumsy and risk red flagging as spam by search engines; at worst, your conversion and usability will suffer, as your visitors become confused or frustrated and leave. "That "back" button is so close," warned Lloyd-Martin.
Search engine performance matters, but conversion matters more. "We're in business to make money, and the search engines are not paying our bills," said Lloyd-Martin. "Whenever you put the computer first, you're leaving customers out," said Bailey.
SEO Overkill Kills RankingsExcessively lengthy strings of keywords stuffed into domain names, page and file names, title and over-the-top keyword tags, meta tag bonanzas and overdone visible text look ludicrous to both search engines and website visitors, said Murray. Similarly, getting too many links pointing to your web site too quickly may get you in trouble with the ranking algorithm.
Using hidden text and micro sites is just really naive. "And watch out for stuffing "no-frames" tags," he added as he displayed an egregious example containing 2000 words.
SEO overkill kills conversion, warned Lloyd-Martin. If you walk the spam line and live on the edge, it will come back to bite you, if not from the search engines, then in your marketing, she warned. Cookie-cutter copy in order to get clicks looks stupid. Linkorama losers drain link popularity away, but more importantly, having too many choices scares people; they don't know what to do.
Pointing to concern for visually impaired website visitors, Bailey said, "Accessibility is optimization." Screen text readers expose over-optimization by presenting only the text, and all of it, scanning just like search engine bots, "Remember, you're only hiding text from people searching with browsers." Similarly, Web-enabled handhelds and cell phones strip out all graphics but display all text including supposedly "hidden" batches of keyword-stuffed copy, as well as longwinded title tags, meta data and alt tags. Plus, scrolling lengthy text on such tiny screens can make visitors quickly lose patience before they do business with your site.
Keyword stuffing doesn't work when it's impossible to understand, said Lloyd-Martin. Misspellings trash your brand. "If you can't get your site right, how will you get my order right?" It's better to build out customer-centered, relevant content than to focus on misspellings of your brand name. Google's "did you mean" function takes care of most misspellings anyway.
If you're spamming, you're on borrowed time, Lloyd Martin warned. "Imagine what would happen to your business if you were to lose all the revenue from your Google referrals."
Further, there's no excuse for an SEO firm putting a website at risk. That's grounds for dismissal. "If your SEO makes you feel funny, and you don't get a good answer, cut 'em loose!" she said.
Overcoming SEO OverkillMurray recommended adding and measuring one link at a time and being very deliberate about what you're doing. "Yes you need traffic," he said, "But pace yourself. Even sound practices may fail if they're rushed." Proceed at an appropriate pace. Conduct good research. Evaluate your progress. Make major headway with basic SEO practices. Optimize your homepage with four or five keywords that are realty important to your website.
"Write impactful headlines. Use inverted pyramid style to put the most important words first," said Bailey, adding "Everything I know about websites I learned in journalism school." Short domains, title tags and concise text get them quickly to what they want—good business for your site. Writing for search engines algorithms is vastly different from writing for visitors.
Lloyd-Martin recommended avoiding conversion confusion by putting calls to action in the content. "Think about the car salesman who slides the contract over and hands you a pen with 'Let's get you a ride home in that baby today.'" Use the "Marketing Rule of Three" to funnel people in.
Do an SEO audit, and then fix your main pages first. Gradually figure out a way to clean up excessive key word use and links. Once you do you'll be doing better with better ROI.
Anne F. Kennedy is managing partner of Beyond Ink, a search marketing agency based in Portland, Maine, with operations in Seattle.
They’ve been called "the Kiss of Death", "Google Hell", and "Screwed Pages", but in any case, Supplemental Results is not where you want your pages to be if you expect traffic from Google.
DOESN'T EVERYONE want their e-mail list to be larger? It's not uncommon, however, to find companies that have not checked off the basic steps. Have you?
WCAG 1.0 was brought into existence in the last century, when there were few web applications and no CMS-managed web sites. Actually, the web has evolved considerably, and we have moved to the next generation of web applications (Web 2.0). This article will explain how it is still possible to apply WCAG 1.0 (and also how to comply with the future WCAG 2.0 and ISO 9241-151) to create an accessible e-shop shopping-cart and backend management system, analyzing the problems and the proposed solutions.
E-shop accessibility: from theory to reality
Author: Roberto Scano
Some good email marketing tools:
Here is a list of words that get tagged as spam or get our emails into bulk emails.
In this article, Chris Pederick's Web Developer toolbar is used for a preliminary assessment of a web site's accessibility.
Although awareness of web accessibility has steadily increased in recent years, many web developers are still uncertain about how to evaluate their sites. The relative complexity of documents such as the W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0 and the wealth of - sometimes contradictory - advice found on sites dedicated to the subject can leave developers wondering about the practical aspects of testing.
Often developers lack time or training and simply rely on one of the many automated testing tools such as WebXACT, Cynthia , or Wave. But even those mechanical checks need to be supplemented (and, to avoid false positives, counter-checked) by manual checks.
Based on some of the WCAG 1.0 checkpoints, this article aims to provide a quick outline of how Mozilla Firefox and the Web Developer toolbar can help with these manual checks.
Ref:Excellent ways to jumpstart buzz about your product, Kalena Sep 13, 2006
What do people see when they view a news website or multimedia feature? Is it what the site's designers expect? ... Perhaps not. The Eyetrack III study literally looked through the eyes of 46 people to learn how they see online news.